Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Berry

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 2001PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 The sentencing issue in this case is whether a juvenile who has been tried as an adult raises a substantial question by claiming that the trial court failed to consider the juvenile’s rehabilitative needs at sentencing. We hold that where the juvenile court held a hearing on the issue of transferring the matter to criminal/adult court, a substantial question is not raised by asserting that the criminal court failed to consider again the juvenile’s rehabilitation needs at time of sentencing. We affirm the judgment of sentence.

¶2 Appellant Ramone Berry was convicted by a jury of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. LoschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. In re J.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CaldwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. SwopeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. RadeckiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Bear Cloud v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API