Legal Opinion
Marine Midland Bank-Eastern National Ass'n v. Conerty Pontiac-Buick, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 11, 1974PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtA. Franklin Mahoney, J.
The plaintiff seeks an order, pursuant to CPLK. 3212, dismissing the answer and any defenses contained therein and directing judgment in its favor as a matter of law.
The defendant, Conerty Bontiac-Buick, Inc., entered into a written floor plan agreement with the plaintiff, dated September 9, 1964. By the terms of said agreement, Conerty granted to plaintiff a security interest in each item of inventory particularized in the schedules annexed to the 'September 9,1964 agreement and, generally, but not limited to, as per paragraph 1 of said agreement, in “motor vehicles and vehicles of all…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Laminated Veneers Co., Inc. v. BassinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Howard's Appliance Corp., Debtor. Sanyo Electric, Inc. v. Howard's Appliance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Morton Booth Co. v. Tiara Furniture, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Interstate Steel Co. v. Ramm Manufacturing Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Hudson Valley Sand & Stone Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Cahill v. Fruehauf Corp. (In Re Associated Transport, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.