Legal Opinion

Rammell v. Smith

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1977No. 14618PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

In a habeas corpus proceeding Elma Arlene Rammell challenges a sentence of a term not to exceed five years in the state prison for conviction of a felony under Sec. 58-37-8(4)(a)(ii), U.C.A.1953, of the “Utah Controlled Substances Act,” which provides:

It shall be unlawful for any person . to acquire or obtain possession of a controlled substance by misrepresentation, fraud, forgery, deception, or subterfuge. 1

Her contention is that she was entitled to be sentenced only for a misdemeanor under Sec. 58-17-14.13, U.C.A.1953, of the “Pharmacists Act” which provides:

No person…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Brown v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. ShondelUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Bryant v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hurst v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Truman v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Chess v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Lonny Morishita v. Lawrence Morris, Warden of the Utah State Prison, and the Attorney General of the State of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  5. Dunn v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API