Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barnes v. George

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 28, 1990No. 89-526Published

1Dissent

Because I would dismiss the appeal on the ground that Ala. Code 1975, § 12-22-10, requires that the appeal be taken from the judgment granting the defendant's motion for a new trial, and not after the judgment in the second trial, I respectfully dissent; and because I dissent on this procedural ground, I would not reach the merits of the appeal.

If we assume that the original post-trial motion for a new trial, pursuant to Rule 59, A.R.Civ.P., was amendable to include the "newly discovered evidence" ground, it is beyond debate that § 12-22-10 (authorizing an appeal from an "interlocutory order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baggett v. Alabama Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Mobile Light & Railroad v. HansenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  3. Marx v. Barbour Plumbing & Elec. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API