Legal Opinion

Fulgham v. AAA Cooper Transportation Co.

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided March 11, 2014No. 2013-CA-00331-COAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Candice Fulgham sued AAA Cooper Transportation Company after she was involved in a traffic accident. Fulgham never named the driver of AAA Cooper’s eighteen-wheeler truck as a defendant. AAA Cooper filed a motion for summary judgment and argued that because the statute of limitations had expired and Fulgham had neither named the driver as a defendant nor served him with process, Fulgham was precluded from recovery against AAA Cooper. The Lee County Circuit Court agreed, and granted AAA Cooper’s motion for summary judgment. Fulgham appeals. We find that, subject…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Karpinsky v. American National Insurance Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Kilhullen v. Kansas City Southern RailwayMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  3. CAPITAL TRANSPORT COMPANY v. McDuffMississippi Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Sykes v. Home Health Care Affiliates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API