Legal Opinion

American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Proffitt

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 30, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKS, Judge.

In this action for condemnation to lay an underground fiber optic telephone cable, the Trial Judge ruled in plaintiffs favor and the issue of damages has been tried to a jury which awarded defendants $3,780.00.

Defendants have appealed.

Defendants’ land is in the route of AT & T’s fiber optic communications cable running from Asheville, North Carolina to Knoxville, Tennessee. The cable was to be installed essentially along the same route as several above-ground transmission lines already established by the Tennessee Valley Authority.

With respect to defendants’ land, TVA…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Old Dominion Land Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Doty v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Murfreesboro v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  2. Doug and Mika Race v. Michael Gault, Esq., Michael N. Wennerlund, Esq., and Bell Carrington Price and Gregg, LLC and Jacob Griefer, Esq.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API