Legal Opinion
Fargot v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 13, 1999PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants separately appeal, as limited by their briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated December 22, 1998, as denied their respective cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the cross motions are granted, and the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed.
For a defendant to be liable in tort to a plaintiff…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wright v. South Nassau Communities HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Thomas v. PhillipsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Digiannantonio v. Richmond Hill Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by7 opinions
- Curran v. EspositoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Moody v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Katekis v. Naut, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Capone v. 450 Lexington Venture, LPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Zelenaya v. RosengartenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.