Legal Opinion
In re Morrison
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 2, 2016No. Case No. 15-14094-MSHPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON THE OBJECTION OF PAUL SERINO TO CONFIRMATION OF CHAPTER 13 PLAN
Melvin S. Hoffman, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge
Paul Serino, a creditor of the debtors, Daniel and Julie Morrison, has objected to confirmation of the Morrisons’ chapter 13 plan on the basis that it fails to treat his claim as secured. The question at issue is, after Mr. Serino paid a debt on which both he and the Morrisons were guarantors, was Mr. Serino subrogated to the lender’s position against the Morrisons, including the lender’s third mortgage position on the Morrissons’ home? The answer is a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- East Boston Savings Bank v. OganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Weitz v. MarramCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- In Re Fiesole Trading Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- In Re WetzlerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- In Re the Medicine ShoppeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crocker v. Matthews (In re Matthews)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Dwyer v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania (In re Pihl, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016