Legal Opinion

Finch v. State Department of Public Welfare

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1956No. 6197PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LA PRADE, Chief Justice.

At the instance of petitioner, Clarence A. Finch, this court issued an alternative writ, of mandamus directed to respondents compelling them to reinstate him to his position as Director of Public Welfare of Maricopa County, from which he had been involuntarily retired, or show cause for not so doing. By their response and in their briefs respondents have contended that they acted within their lawful authority in retiring petitioner and for that reason the writ should be quashed.

The uncontroverted tacts are as follows: Finch was the Director of Public Welfare of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Moore v. ArchibaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Mendelsohn v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. United States v. Vogue, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  4. Beach v. Superior Court of Apache CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Woods v. NicholasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Selective Life Insurance v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. CassiusArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Fahey v. Cook County Police Department Merit BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. O'Malley Lumber Co. v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  5. Trump v. BadetArizona Supreme Court · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API