People v. Erbel
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of unlawfully manufacturing intoxicating liquor, alleged in the information to be “fit for use for beverage purposes.” His motion for a new trial was denied. This appeal is from the judgment and the order denying a new trial.
It was stipulated at the trial that the liquor in-question contained fifty per cent of alcohol by volume, but it is contended that there is no evidence to show that it was fit for beverage purposes. One of the men engaged with the defendant in manufacturing the liquor testified that it was jackass brandy. He described fully the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. SamaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Ex parte GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- People v. ConleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- People v. BassettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. VoiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929