Legal Opinion

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Coombs

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1999No. 98-2656PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Contrary to respondent’s assertions at the hearing, the practice of law encompasses those activities that are incidental to appearances in court, including the preparation of legal documents and the management of proceedings on behalf of clients. Richland Cty. Bar Assn. v. Clapp (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 276, 278, 703 N.E.2d 771, 772.

Respondent’s misconduct, which included his improper notarization of the leases, warrants a six-month suspension from the practice of law with the entire term stayed. Cf. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richland County Bar Ass'n v. ClappOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. ReisenfeldOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. DoughertyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Akron Bar Ass'n v. CoombsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Akron Bar Assn. v. CoombsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Akron Bar Assn. v. CoombsOhio Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API