Legal Opinion

Sellers v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 23, 1991No. CR-89-1240PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dana Lee Sellers appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, wherein he sought review of the action of the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles (hereinafter "the Board") revoking his parole.

While the trial court gave no reason for denying the petition other than the fact that it did so on the pleadings, its denial was proper, because review of an action of the Board is not by a habeas corpus proceeding. Generally, habeas corpus is inappropriate as a remedy to review the actions of an administrative board or commission, such as the Board. The appropriate remedy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ellard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Ex Parte EllardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Ex Parte Baldwin County Com'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BoykinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  3. Doucette v. Massachusetts Parole BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  4. Collins v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Ex Parte Bd. of Pardons and ParolesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API