State v. Mills
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GUNN, Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction for arson and raises two points of alleged trial error which he contends warrant a new trial: 1) that inadmissible hearsay testimony was permitted; 2) that the State’s verdict directing arson instruction was an improper deviation from MAI-CR 7.02. We affirm the judgment.
On November 16, 1973, St. Louis police officers Daniel Cregan and John Clobes responded to a call and found the rear porch of the residence of defendant’s mother in flames. Firemen were quickly able to extinguish the flames. After talking with defendant’s mother, Mrs.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State v. MaxwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State v. NimrodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Peterson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- State v. ZeitvogelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. FletcherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- State v. CliftonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. ProctorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.