Legal Opinion
McCandless v. Trans Penn Wax Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 13, 1993No. Civ. A. 93-126EPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COHILL, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for reconsideration of our Order of October 7, 1993 granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand. For the reasons stated herein, we will deny the motion for reconsideration.
7. Background
The essential facts of this case are not in dispute. This dispute arises out of an employee effort to decertify Local 8240 of the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers’ International Union as the collective bargaining representatives for manufacturing employees at the defendant Trans Penn Wax Corporation’s (Trans Penn) plant.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trans Penn Wax Corporation v. Michael MccandlessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Trans Penn Wax Corp. v. McCandlessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995