Legal Opinion

Bliss v. Carroll

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1885No. 8732PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The findings show the plaintiff, Bliss, to be the true owner of the brandy in controversy. It was manufactured by one Belden, who was a licensed United States distiller, for the assignor of the plaintiff, for a certain sum per gallon. The brandy was made of grapes belonging to plain*596tiff’s assignor, who, in order that the payment of the government tax of ninety cents per gallon might be delayed, in accordance with the laws of the United States, caused Belden to store it in a United States bonded warehouse. The law of the United States in respect to the matter required that such brandy should…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wells Fargo Nevada National Bank v. Haslett Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API