Milanese v. City of Boca Raton
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentStevenson, J.
I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the final judgment of dismissal and allow the case to proceed. The gravamen of the estate’s claim is that the police placed Milanese in a zone of risk by taking him into custody and then releasing him in a manner which created an unreasonable and foreseeable risk of harm considering Milanese’s physical condition (“impaired, drunk and inebriated”), the time of day (the dark hours of early morning), and the location of his release (near active railroad tracks). Thus, the estate claims that a duty of care arose under Florida tort law. A duty of care is “a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McCain v. Florida Power CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Trianon Park Condominium v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Kaisner v. KolbSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.