Suber v. Chandler
Supreme Court of South Carolina
This was an appeal by defendants from the following order : It appearing to the court that Lambert J. Jones, in his own right and as survivor of the firm of Jones & Jones, which was composed of Lambert J. Jones and Benson M. Jones, now deceased, has an interest in the determination of this action by reason of assignments, dated respectively December 22, 1873, and August 7, 1874, by the plaintiff to the said Lambert J. Jones and Jones & Jones of the note upon which the…
Read the full summary
This was an appeal by defendants from the following order : It appearing to the court that Lambert J. Jones, in his own right and as survivor of the firm of Jones & Jones, which was composed of Lambert J. Jones and Benson M. Jones, now deceased, has an interest in the determination of this action by reason of assignments, dated respectively December 22, 1873, and August 7, 1874, by the plaintiff to the said Lambert J. Jones and Jones & Jones of the note upon which the judgment in favor of the plaintiff set forth in the complaint is founded by way of collateral security for the payment of…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Justice McGowan.
This case was once before in this court, and that opinion fully states the facts. It there appears that the action was brought on the part of the plaintiff, Ivy M. Súber, claiming to be a judgment creditor of Thomas Chandler, deceased, to set aside a voluntary conveyance of a certain tract of land in Newberry County, executed in his life-time (September, 1869) to his wife and two daughters, the defendants. The action in which the judgment of Súber was recovered on a sealed note bearing date in 1863 was commenced in 1874, and went…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Farmers' and Mechanics' Bank of Genesee v. . WadsworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sentell v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903