Legal Opinion
Apex.AI, Inc. v. Langmead
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 10, 2023No. 5:23-cv-02230Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 APEX.AI, INC., Case No. 23-cv-02230-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 9 v. PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TRO AND 10 NEIL RICHARD LANGMEAD, an ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY individual; VERIFA, INC., a Massachusetts PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 11 corporation; and CODECLINIC LLC dba SHOULD NOT ISSUE; AND SETTING LATTIX, a Massachusetts limited liability HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 12 company, FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 13 Defendants. [Re: ECF 6] 14 15 16 Plaintiff Apex.AI, Inc. (“Apex.AI”) filed the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Bruce Lee Jorgensen v. Benjamin B. Cassiday, III Salvador Laurel, Bruce Lee Jorgensen v. Benjamin B. Cassiday, III Salvador LaurelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- State of Washington v. Donald J. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.