Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mitchell v. Wells

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1859Published

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Madison county: Hon. E. G. Henry, chancellor.

1Dissent

Handy, J.,

delivered the following dissenting opinion.

I cannot concur in the views of this case taken by the majority of the court. Many of the views taken in the opinion of the court have, in my judgment, no application to the questions we are called upon to decide in the ease before us. The abstract policy of slavery, or of the manumission or freedom of slaves, is a question not belonging to this forum, nor proper to be determined by it. We are sitting as a court to adjudicate whether an emancipated slave has certain legal rights claimed by her. We have no right to establish or enlarge the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Garrett v. BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1852
  3. Read v. ManningMississippi Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Lusk v. LewisMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Shaw v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API