Legal Opinion

Mett v. City of Schenectady

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1935Published

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

This is an action to restrain the enforcement of an ordinance of the city of Schenectady regulating the sale of solid fuel and requiring the coal dealers of the city to procure licenses and to pay a license fee;

The plaintiffs, coal dealers, contend that the ordinance is void, primarily because coal is not a commodity the sale of which may be regulated by city authority; that the license fee imposed is excessive, discriminatory and unfair; that the provisions in the ordinance for *209compulsory insurance are beyond municipal authority; that the licensing board, under the provisions of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. People v. . GillsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. People Ex Rel. Moskowitz v. . JenkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API