Legal Opinion

People v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 8, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the plea allocution is not preserved for appellate review, as a matter of law (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hoke, 62 NY2d 1022; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, the allocution satisfied the requirements of People v Harris (61 NY2d 9) and thus vacatur is not warranted (see, People v De Santis, 108 AD2d 821; People v Schron, 109 AD2d 762).

In addition, we find no merit in defendant’s contention that the imposed sentence of 8 to 16 years’ imprisonment for his robbery conviction, which was the product of a negotiated plea, was unduly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. PellegrinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. KazepisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. People v. HokeNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API