People v. Moore
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the plea allocution is not preserved for appellate review, as a matter of law (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hoke, 62 NY2d 1022; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, the allocution satisfied the requirements of People v Harris (61 NY2d 9) and thus vacatur is not warranted (see, People v De Santis, 108 AD2d 821; People v Schron, 109 AD2d 762).
In addition, we find no merit in defendant’s contention that the imposed sentence of 8 to 16 years’ imprisonment for his robbery conviction, which was the product of a negotiated plea, was unduly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. PellegrinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. KazepisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. HokeNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985