Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Hafeez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 2003Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRead, J.

I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that there is no record support for the jury’s decision that defendant’s and codefendant’s conduct was reckless and depraved rather than intentional. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent from that part of the Court’s opinion affirming the Appellate Division’s reversal of the depraved indifference murder conviction.

*261The jury convicted defendant of depraved indifference murder under an accomplice liability theory (see Penal Law § 20.00). The People, therefore, had to show that defendant intentionally aided his codefendant, and that they shared the same…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BrathwaiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. KibbeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. SanchezNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. People v. PoplisNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Darry v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1854

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API