Legal Opinion

State v. Rouse

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 11, 1983No. C 81-10-35507; CA A24006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction of conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree. He first contends that the trial court erred in instructing the jury pursuant to Uniform Jury Instruction 404.15. However, defendant asked the trial judge to give the challenged instruction. Therefore, if there was any error, it was invited and defendant cannot now complain. Defendant asks that we consider his first assignment pursuant to ORAP 7.19(5). We decline to do so.

In State v. Thompson, 28 Or App 409, 413, 559 P2d 1294, rev den 278 Or 393 (1977), we explained:

“Finally, defendant concedes that he did…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WedgeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. State v. ThiesiesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. HendersonWashington Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API