Lorentz v. Deardan
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
FARMER, Judge.
The defendants have appealed from the trial court’s judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs finding the defendants to be in violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, ordering rescission of the contract of sale valued at $12,792.22, and awarding treble damages of $38,376.66. At the trial’s conclusion, the judge also awarded plaintiffs attorneys’ fees in the amount of $25,000.00.
In March 1987, the Lorentzes purchased a 1987 Pontiac Firebird from Ozzie Dear-dan, sales agent for Homer Skelton. Dear-dan represented that the car had previously been…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City Dodge, Inc. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Frank v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- Bernard v. Central Carolina Truck Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Brungard v. Caprice Records, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
- Haverlah v. Memphis Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Concrete Spaces, Inc. v. SenderTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Lien v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Duran v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
- Richardson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Bandy v. RobertsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.