Legal Opinion

Lorentz v. Deardan

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 12, 1992PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARMER, Judge.

The defendants have appealed from the trial court’s judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs finding the defendants to be in violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, ordering rescission of the contract of sale valued at $12,792.22, and awarding treble damages of $38,376.66. At the trial’s conclusion, the judge also awarded plaintiffs attorneys’ fees in the amount of $25,000.00.

In March 1987, the Lorentzes purchased a 1987 Pontiac Firebird from Ozzie Dear-dan, sales agent for Homer Skelton. Dear-dan represented that the car had previously been…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City Dodge, Inc. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  2. Frank v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Bernard v. Central Carolina Truck Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Brungard v. Caprice Records, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  5. Haverlah v. Memphis Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Concrete Spaces, Inc. v. SenderTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Lien v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  3. Duran v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  4. Richardson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. Bandy v. RobertsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API