Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Thompson v. City of Kearney

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Original application for mandamus. cited: Dill, on Mun. Corp., 2d edition, 2d vol., Sec. 666. State, ex rel. ITahn, v. Hardy, 7 Neb., 379. Wadleigh v. Gilman, 12 Maine, 403.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

The plaintiff alleges in his petition, “ that he is a resident tax-payer and elector of the said city; that the city of Kearney is a city of the second class, of more than 5,000 inhabitants and less than 25,000 inhabitants, duly and legally organized and proclaimed under the general laws of the state of Nebraska, for the incorporation of cities and towns within the state; that the said Lawrence Ketchum is the legally appointed, duly qualified, and acting marshal of the said city of Kearney ; that on the 29th day of November, 1886, the council of said city, in accordance with the power granted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Case v. CollinsNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. State ex rel. Willard v. StearnsNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  3. State ex rel. Ferguson v. ShropshireNebraska Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sawyer Stores, Inc. v. MitchellMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State ex rel. Adkins v. LienSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Milwaukee Horse & Cow Commission Co. v. HillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Cooperrider v. State ex rel. StevensNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State ex rel. Gillilan v. Home Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API