State ex rel. Nesslage v. Village of Flint Hill
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SATZ, Judge.
This is an action under the Sawyer Act, § 71.015 RSMo.Supp.1984.1 The City of Wentzville (Wentzville) and the Village of Flint Hill (Flint Hill) attempted to annex the same land. After a hearing on stipulated facts, the trial court “divested” Flint Hill “of any jurisdiction over” the land in question and concluded that Wentzville “must” hold “new elections ... within a reasonable period of time” in order “to complete [its] annexation process.” Flint Hill appeals. We reverse and remand with directions.
Wentzville, a municipal corporation, and Flint Hill, a village, are both located…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- St. Charles Savings Bank v. DenkeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- City of Joplin v. Village of Shoal Creek DriveMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- MAYOR, COUNCILMEN, ETC. v. Dealers Transport Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- STATE EX INF. VOIGTS, ETC. v. City of Pleasant ValleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of St. Joseph v. Village of Country ClubSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- City of Bridgeton v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- In re City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- City of St. Joseph v. Village of AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Ozark Financial Services v. TurnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.