Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Nesslage v. Village of Flint Hill

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1986No. 50518PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Judge.

This is an action under the Sawyer Act, § 71.015 RSMo.Supp.1984.1 The City of Wentzville (Wentzville) and the Village of Flint Hill (Flint Hill) attempted to annex the same land. After a hearing on stipulated facts, the trial court “divested” Flint Hill “of any jurisdiction over” the land in question and concluded that Wentzville “must” hold “new elections ... within a reasonable period of time” in order “to complete [its] annexation process.” Flint Hill appeals. We reverse and remand with directions.

Wentzville, a municipal corporation, and Flint Hill, a village, are both located…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. St. Charles Savings Bank v. DenkeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  2. City of Joplin v. Village of Shoal Creek DriveMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. MAYOR, COUNCILMEN, ETC. v. Dealers Transport Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. STATE EX INF. VOIGTS, ETC. v. City of Pleasant ValleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of St. Joseph v. Village of Country ClubSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  2. City of Bridgeton v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. In re City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. City of St. Joseph v. Village of AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Ozark Financial Services v. TurnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API