Omni Packaging, Inc. v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON ATTORNEY’S FEES
PIERAS, District Judge.
The Court has before it plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees (docket No. 18), pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), see 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), defendants’ opposition thereto (docket No. 21), and plaintiffs’ reply to the opposition (docket No. 22). Having fully considered these motions, the Court finds that plaintiffs are not entitled to attorney’s fees for the reasons stated below. Accordingly, plaintiffs’ motion is hereby DENIED.
I. INTRODUCTION
For a history of this case, and a recounting of the relevant facts,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Federal Election Commission v. Congressman Charles G. RoseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Sierra Club v. Secretary of the Army, Sierra Club v. Secretary of the Army, Sierra Club v. Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Franklin M. YoffeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Harold BROUSSARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Louisiana Philharmonic Orchestra v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1999
- United States v. Cacho-BonillaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002