Legal Opinion
Millman Broder & Curtis v. Antonelli
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 22, 1985No. 83-1043PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REILLY, Chief Judge, Retired:
This is an appeal from an order entered in the Landlord and Tenant Branch of the Superior Court granting a motion for summary judgment in the amount of $49,574.93 and reasonable attorney fees. The parties to this case are the owners of the downtown office building (the “landlord”) which in 1979 entered into a written lease of office space to a professional corporation (the “tenant”) for a ten year term. Some five years later, the landlord filed a complaint alleging a default in the covenant to pay the monthly rent which sought summary possession and a money…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- William T. Bell and Margie Bell v. Tsintolas Realty Company, James Coates v. Ruppert Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Andrade v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- McNeal v. HabibDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Winchester Management Corp. v. StatenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Pollock v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carter v. CarterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Farmer v. FarmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Killingham v. Wilshire Investments Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Pinzon v. a & G PROPERTIESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Quality Management, LLC v. Time & Place World, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.