Legal Opinion
State v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided October 9, 1961No. 48669PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HYDE, Judge.
Motion to vacate judgment under Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R. Defendant was charged with first degree robbery (Sec. 560.120, statutory citations are to RSMo, V.A.M.S.) and sentenced to seven years in the penitentiary on a plea of guilty. The court overruled the motion and defendant has appealed.
Defendant asked for “process of ad pros-equendum et ad testificandum” for the purpose of proving the averments of his motion, which was not granted. Instead as the order states, the court “having reviewed the court reporter’s notes of the conference in chambers between the defendant, the Court, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Waley v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hawk v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- House v. MayoSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- State v. HutchinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- State v. LinderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.