Legal Opinion

People v. Bell

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1994No. B079014PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STONE (S. J.), P. J.

Winfred Bell appeals from the order extending his commitment to the Department of Mental Health after a jury found that he continued to be a mentally disordered offender (MDO). (Pen. Code, §§ 2962, 2966, subd. (c).) He contends: “I. The trial court erred in failing to correctly instruct on the time parameter for proof of the MDO criteria and its error was prejudicial. II. The trial court committed reversible error in allowing the prosecution’s expert to testify to an opinion by an out of court doctor.”

The record reflects that, on March 26, 1991, appellant was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. People v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. CamposCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. People v. MERFIELDCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. People v. CamposCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Lopez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. Andrew H. CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API