Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Mees v. Mathieu

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1932No. Appeal 236PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opieioe by

Baldeige, J.,

The relator, the maternal grandmother, instituted this proceeding to procure custody of her grandchild, J. P. Mathieu, III, aged seven years, who has been in the possession of his father, the appellant. The mother died April 17,1931. After a hearing, the court awarded custody of the child to the relator. Assuming the truth of the testimony that was taken, the child’s best interest would seem to be subserved by awarding him to his grandmother. The difficulty that presents itself is the question of the municipal court’s jurisdiction in this particular case.

On January…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wettengel v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Wilson v. GarlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Bluestone v. DeroySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Miller v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Camp v. CampSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. State Col. Boro. Auth. v. Pa. P.U.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Burton v. BaldiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Reilly v. ReillySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. State College Borough Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API