On the House Syndication, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY AND TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY FROM CLASS MEMBERS
STIVEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On June 8, 2001, Defendant Federal Express Corp. (“FedEx”) submitted an ex parte application to reopen discovery and to obtain *453discovery from absent class members. Plaintiffs filed a response on June 14, 2001.
II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On June 25, 1999, Defendant timely removed this action from San Diego Superior Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Subsequently, on June 30,1999, Defendant filed its answer to Plaintiffs’ complaint. On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sidney Clark and Julia Clark v. Universal Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- AAMCO Automatic Transmissions, Inc. v. TayloeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Wainwright v. Kraftco Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McPhail v. First Command Financial Planning, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2008
- Aspinall v. Philip Morris CompaniesMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005
- Aldapa v. Fowler Packing Company Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Arends v. Family Solutions of Ohio, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- BUTCH v. ALCOA USA CORP.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.