League of Women Voters v. King County Records, Elections & Licensing Services Division
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1 A dismissal of a plaintiff’s case is generally mandatory at any time before “plaintiff rests at the conclusion of his [or her] opening case.”1 Plaintiff The League of Women Voters of Washington (the League) moved to dismiss its case almost seven months after winning a preliminary injunction at a contested hearing. Intervenor Save Mercer Island’s Single Occupant Vehicle (SAVE MI SOV) argues that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the dismissal motion. Because the preliminary injunction hearing was not the functional equivalent of a trial in this case, we affirm.
Cox, J.
¶2 The…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Harvey Aluminum, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- State v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Rettkowski v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Longview v. WallinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Ameriquest Mortg. Co. v. State Atty. Gen.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Northwest Gas Ass'n v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Northwest Gas Ass'n v. WASHINGTON UTILITIES & TRANSP. COM'NCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Ameriquest Mortgage Co. v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.