Legal Opinion

Kincaid v. Hensel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1936No. 25795. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

This is an action to set aside a sale of real property under execution. The facts out of which the controversy arose are as follows: Rex Kincaid is the son of Julia A. Kincaid, and the grandson of Julia A. Hines. The latter conveyed the property in question to Julia A. Kincaid in trust for the use and benefit of Rex. Under the declaration of trust, the trustee had the power to sell, and, pursuant to that power, she entered into a contract to sell the property to the defendants ¥m. C. Hensel and Estella P. Hensel, his wife. This contract was dated November 10, 1931. September 28, 1933, the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Davis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. O'Brien v. . JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Wahl v. SchmidtIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Louisville Trust Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Alfano v. DonnellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Krueger's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Petroleum Royalties Co. of Oklahoma v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. Only Collections, Inc. v. County of CochiseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. Jenner v. GostinaWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Judy v. Guaranty Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API