Legal Opinion
United States v. La Duca
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 10, 1978No. Crim. 75-56PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STERN, District Judge.
Defendant Anthony La Duca stands convicted of willful embezzlement of funds of the Paper Industry Union Management Pension Fund, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 664. He now moves, pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The claimed newly discovered evidence consists of the testimony of La Duca’s co-defendant John Neiman. Neiman had pleaded guilty and was awaiting sentence at the time of La Duca’s trial. Called to the stand by La Duca during trial, Neiman invoked his Fifth Amendment…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Philip Berrigan, in No. 72-1938, and Elizabeth McAlister Appeal of Elizabeth McAlister InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Walter Morrison A/K/A "Skip" Morrison Appeal of Nick BosciaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Irie E. Leonard, United States of America v. James L. SarvisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Norman TurkishCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- State v. BelangerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Charles Diggs v. David Owens, Superintendent and John Daughn, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- UNITED STATES of America v. Arthur S. LOWELL, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Guido Rocco, John Martin Neiman, Anthony R. La Duca, Herman Levine, Anthony R. La DucaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.