Legal Opinion

(PC) Landreth v. Lehil

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 13, 2023No. 2:20-cv-00472Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRANDON MICHAEL LANDRETH, No. 2:20-CV-00472-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 BHUPINDER LEHIL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions relating to discovery 19 propounded to Defendants Posson, Carrick, and Lehil, ECF Nos. 66, 69, 81, 95, 97.1 20 The purpose of discovery is to “remove surprise from trial preparation so the 21 parties can obtain evidence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. William Hunt v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Avila v. Willits Environmental Remediation TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. In Re Grand Jury Investigation. United States of America v. The Corporation 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States ex rel. O'Connell v. Chapman UniversityDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API