Legal Opinion

State v. Chrzan

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1998No. 66A04-9705-CR-173PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTSON, Senior Judge.

The State filed charges of misappropriation of funds and the knowing use of a false measure, both misdemeanors, against the defendant-appellee. The trial court granted a motion to dismiss the charges, holding that the two-year statute of limitations barred prosecution. The State now appeals, raising the issue of whether the statute of limitations was tolled by the concealment exception to the limitations period. We reverse and remand.

The applicable statute reads in pertinent part:(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a prosecution for an offense is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. State v. HolmesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Crider v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. State v. HokeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reeves v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Kifer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Peter T. Dvorak v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. John O. Study v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Michael Amos v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API