Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Steamboat Favorite

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1865PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The complaint alleges in substance that the defendant is a steamboat, and used and employed by the masters, owners, &c., thereof, in carrying and transporting passengers and freight for hire as a regular business and public employment on the Mississippi River from St. Paul, Minnesota, to La Crosse, Wisconsin, &c., and has been so used and employed for more than three years last past, and is now lying at the port of St. Paul in said county, &c.; that one David R. Reynolds oh…

Read the full summary

The complaint alleges in substance that the defendant is a steamboat, and used and employed by the masters, owners, &c., thereof, in carrying and transporting passengers and freight for hire as a regular business and public employment on the Mississippi River from St. Paul, Minnesota, to La Crosse, Wisconsin, &c., and has been so used and employed for more than three years last past, and is now lying at the port of St. Paul in said county, &c.; that one David R. Reynolds oh the 23d day of. October, 1862, entered into a contract in writing with said defendant, in and by which the defendant…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court —

Wilson, C. J.

— It is now settled that the admiralty jurisdiction of the United States Courts extends to all fivers or waters navigable in fact from the sea by vessels of ten or more tons burden, Genesee Chief vs. Fitzhue, 12 How. U. S. Rep., 443; Fritz vs. Bull, Id., 466.

Sec. 2, of Art. 3, of the Constitution of the United States, provides that the judicial power of the United States extends to all cases of admiralty <;r maritime jurisdiction. In pursuance of this jmmsion Congress might vest in the' United States Courts exclusive jurisdiction of this class of. cases, but a grant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  2. The SarahSupreme Court of the United States · 1823

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Benedict v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Siebert v. QuesnelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Leithauser v. BaumeisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Kaufman v. BarbourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Campion v. WhitneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API