Blanchard ex rel. Blanchard v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Concurrence
DURHAM, J.,
specially concurring.
I agree with the majority that the parties’ disagreement about whether the treatment plan describes a service that must be covered pursuant to ORS 743.706(2) cannot be resolved by a summary judgment. However, the majority applies an interpretive gloss to the statute that changes its clear meaning and that will undermine its proper application on remand. I do not agree with that construction.
ORS 743.706 provides:
“(1) The Legislative Assembly declares that all group health insurance policies providing hospital, medical or surgical expense benefits include…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Teeny v. Haertl Constructors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Allen v. Pacific Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988