Legal Opinion
Bissell v. Papastavros' Associates Medical Imaging
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided February 18, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERLIHY, Judge.
Presently before the Court are motions to dismiss and for summary judgment filed by Papastavros’ Associates Medical Imaging [defendant], a general partnership.
Harry Bissell [plaintiff] is the husband of the late Mary C. Bissell [Bissell]. He brings suit individually and as her personal representative. In his original complaint, plaintiff alleged that defendant negligently failed to notify Bissell of the results of a 1989 test that revealed the presence of breast cancer.
Previously, this Court had granted plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint, which was done over…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Merrill v. Crothall-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Spence v. FunkSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
- Ewing v. BeckSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
- Vanaman Ex Rel. Vanaman v. Milford Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grey v. Stamford Health System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Smith v. WallaceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Ashland LLC v. Samuel J. Heyman 1981 Continuing Trust for Lazarus S. HeymanSuperior Court of Delaware · 2018