Legal Opinion

Buttrick v. Woman's Hospital Aid Ass'n

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 1, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoodbury, J.

The exception is properly before us for consideration even though it was not taken with technical nicety. Counsel for the plaintiff objected to a statement made in argument. The grounds for his objection, though stated by counsel for the defendant, were made to appear and the court’s ruling thereon is to be inferred from his granting of the exception. Thus the four elements necessary to save a valid exception to argument were all present. There was an objection, the grounds for the objection appeared, there was a ruling by the court and an exception thereto by the party adversely affected.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. DodgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  2. Gobrecht v. BeckwithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  3. Colby v. LeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  4. Hall v. Wentworth's LocationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Humphreys v. AshSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  2. Smith v. BaileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  3. White Mountain National Bank v. MalloySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API