Lamb v. Lamb
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.
The parties to this case were divorced by-decree entered in the trial court on December 13, 1954. On the 8th of December preceding they entered into a property settlement agreement which by its terms indicated that it was prepared in accordance with an oral understanding, reached in court, which allowed defendant to proceed on her cross bill. The provisions of the agreement were incorporated in the decree, pursuant to which defendant was granted the custody of the 3 minor children of the parties and plaintiff and cross defendant was required to pay $100 per month for their support, subject to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Geark v. GearkMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Christensen v. ChristensenMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Jernigan v. JerniganMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Harter v. HarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Rowe v. RoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hershey v. HersheySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Butler v. ButlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Esslinger v. EsslingerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Yanz v. YanzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.