Legal Opinion
Ralph Monroe v. State of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided April 28, 2016No. SC14-2296PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Per curiam
This case is before the Court to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Monroe v. State, 148 So.3d 850 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). In its decision the district court ruled upon the following question, which the court certified to be of great public importance:
DO F.B. V. STATE, 852 So.2d 226 (Fla.2003), AND YOUNG v. STATE, 141 So.3d 161 (Fla.2013), REQUIRE PRESERVATION OF AN EVIDENTIARY DEFICIENCY WHERE THE STATE PROVED ONLY A LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE AND THE SENTENCE REQUIRED. FOR THE' GREATER OFFENSE WOULD BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS APPLIED TO THE LESSER OFFENSE?
Id. at 861. We have…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Tibbs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State of Florida v. Earvin SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
- Arnold Jerome Knight v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Orando Ricardo Thompson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- RONNIE TRAVIS KRUSE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Lesovsky v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.