Legal Opinion
Messina v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 8, 1965No. 1673PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CHASEZ, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Marie Messina, wife of and Daniel Alfortish sue Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company (now known as Hanover Insurance Company), insurer of Joy Bowling Lanes ex delicto for damages sustained when Mrs. Alfortish was struck in the lower abdomen by a bowling ball. The accident occurred while Mrs. Alfortish was on the premises of Joy Bowling Lanes.
From a judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ demands, plaintiffs appeal.
The record reveals that Mrs. Alfortish was attending the Women’s Louisiana State Bowling Tournament which was being held at Joy Bowling Lanes. On the day…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- De Hart v. Travelers Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
- Himel v. RyderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Kenning v. Herrin Transportation Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cryer v. New Orleans Union Passenger TerminalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968