Moses v. Hasbrouck

The plaintiff by his action sought to make the defendants liable for certain claims which he professed to hold against the Bondout and Oswego Bailroad Company. The right of recovery was resisted on various grounds, and the issues in the suit were referred to Charles H. Winfield as sole referee to hear and decide.

After a long and protracted hearing the referee made a report in favor of the defendants. An order having been made by this court that each of the defendants should have an extra allowance of $500, a judgment was entered on the 5th day of June, 1878, against the plaintiff for the…