Biglow v. Biglow
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Martha A. Biglow against Harriet Biglow and Louisa Wooster, impleaded with others, for partition. An interlocutory judgment of sale was ordered, from which said two defendants appeal, with notice of intention to bring up for review on such appeal the order referring the case.
1Opinion of the CourtMerwin, J.
It is conceded that on the 20th April, 1866, Angelina Moore became the owner of the property in question, consisting of a house and a small lot. At that date she, with her husband, Samuel-M. Moore, conveyed the same by warranty deed to John C. Biglow and Joseph Biglow. The plaintiff was the wife of Joseph Biglow, and claims to have acquired his interest in the property by virtue of a deed from him to F. H. Murray, under date of March 19, 1867, witnessed, but not acknowledged or recorded, and a deed from Murray to the plaintiff, March 15, 1892. Joseph Biglow died in 1896. Some time in the year…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The People v. . SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Weston v. . StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Whiting v. . EdmundsNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Arents v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Best v. ZehNew York Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.