Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Home Service Stores

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1932Published

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The appeal in this case was dismissed, anle, 231, for failure to comply with the rules; but, on motion and completion of the record, it has been reinstated.

A single question is presented for decision: Is a chattel mortgage duly authorized by a corporation and signed in its name by its president and attested by its secretary void for failure to attach the corporate seal? We think not.

It was said in Duke v. Markham, 105 N. C., 131, 10 S. E., 1017, 18 Am. St. Rep., 889, that a seal is not essential to the validity of a chattel mortgage whether executed by an individual or a corporation.

The party…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Duke v. . MarkhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Bailey v. . HassellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Rawlings v. . HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. Benbow v. . CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Comron v. . StandlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API