Legal Opinion

Nash v. Pennsylvania R.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 27, 1932No. 5965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment on a verdict for defendant, directed at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case. Except for medical testimony, plaintiff was the sole witness. He was employed in defendant’s yards at Columbus, Ohio, in several capacities; his primary duty, in which he had been engaged for some four months, was the operation of the sand-drying apparatus in the sand house, of which he had sole charge. In addition, he had several tasks to perform outside of the sand house.

The sand house is a narrow building having a basement and three single-room stories. Wet sand…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norton v. LarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Herron v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Columbus & Greenville R. Co. v. Miller Ex Rel. Mississippi Levee Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Erie R. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Osthaus v. ButtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
  2. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. RitterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  3. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. RiggsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  4. Ristucci v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  5. Penny v. Cottingham Retirement Community IncDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API