Hanenkamp's Administrator v. Borgmier
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to Cole Circuit Cowrt. The plaintiff had no right to recover on the evidence offered and given in the cause. There was no evidence tending to show that Borgmier, administrator of John Hanenkamp, had notice of the fact that Ewing had administered on the estate of the minor child of his intestate in Cole county, or that there was any demands against her unpaid.
Read the full summary
Error to Cole Circuit Cowrt. The plaintiff had no right to recover on the evidence offered and given in the cause. There was no evidence tending to show that Borgmier, administrator of John Hanenkamp, had notice of the fact that Ewing had administered on the estate of the minor child of his intestate in Cole county, or that there was any demands against her unpaid. Now, Mary Adelaide Hanenkamp and Mary Ann Hanenkamp, on the death of their father, John Hanenkamp, became joint tenants in their father’s estate; and after the payment of all debts they would take the money in the hands, of the…
1Opinion of the CourtBates, Judge
This suit is brought from the Cole Circuit Court by writ *571of error. John Hanenkamp died in 1855, and defendant administered his estate. Hanenkamp left two children, his heirs, Mary Adelaide and Mary Ann. Mary Adelaide married and survives. Mary Ann died in 1856, and in 1857, by order of the County Court, the public administrator, the plaintiff, took charge of her estate, and debts were allowed against it. In 1858, defendant made final settlement of the estate of John Hanenkamp, and was ordered to pay over the balance in his hands to those entitled thereto under the law. He paid the whole to…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Burnes v. BurnesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- State ex rel. Hounsom v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- Green v. TittmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Adey v. AdeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
- Rouggley v. TeichmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.