Meyrovitz v. Glaser
Supreme Court of Alabama
APPEAL from Barbour Chancery Court. L-learc[ before 1-Ion. \`V. L. I-'ARICS. The bill was filed by 0-laser, Kuder & Ottensosser and other creditOrs of J. Meyrovitz `against him and certain attaching `creditors, and sought to set aside the attachments as frauduh cut and collusive. From a -decree for complainants defendants appeal. cited 65 Ala. 572; 78 Ala. 491; 114 Ala. 506; 26 So. Rep. 311; 28 So. Rep. 527; 176 U. S. 98, 189.
1Opinion of the CourtDowdell, J.
This was a bill by certain creditors of J. Meyrovitz, the common debtor, and was filed for the purpose of setting aside certain attachments sued out by other creditors of said debtor as being fraudulent and collusive. The answers of the respondents expressly and unequivocally deny the allegations of fraud and collusion. The cause was heard on the ~leathngs and evidence, and a final decree was rendered in favor of the complainants, and from this decree the present appeal is prosecuted.
The indebtedness from the common debtor to the attaching creditors is not `denied by complainants, but on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Adams v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- H. B. Chaflin Co. v. Muscogee Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Warren & Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- Putney & Co. v. WolbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899